In recent years, Holden Thorpe, editor of the academic journal ‘Science’, has made some unusual claims. One of these claims is that anyone involved in or around the field of science, such as a journalist, politician or activist, is considered a scientist. Dr. Henry Miller of ACSH disagrees with this statement.

In episode 78 of the Science Dispatch podcast, Cameron English and Dr. Chuck Dinerstein discussed Holden Thorpe’s definition of a scientist. They believe that the editor-in-chief of a respected scientific journal should have a clear understanding of what a scientist is and argued that Thorpe’s definition is incorrect.

Listeners can tune in to the Science Dispatch podcast on platforms such as iTunes, Spotify, Stitcher and Google Podcasts. Alternatively, they can add an RSS feed to their favorite podcast app to keep up with new episodes. By subscribing to the Dispatch newsletter, listeners can receive stories like these straight to their inbox for easy access.

It is crucial to be clear about what defines a scientist, especially when it comes from a highly respected figure such as the editor of a prominent scientific journal. By challenging misconceptions and promoting accurate definitions, individuals can ensure that the integrity of scientific discourse is preserved.

By Samantha Johnson

As a dedicated content writer at newspuk.com, I immerse myself in the art of storytelling through words. With a keen eye for detail and a passion for crafting engaging narratives, I strive to captivate our audience with each piece I create. Whether I'm covering breaking news, delving into feature articles, or exploring thought-provoking editorials, my goal remains constant: to inform, entertain, and inspire through the power of writing. Join me on this journalistic journey as we navigate through the ever-evolving media landscape together.

Leave a Reply