Finland’s stance on the EU renewal regulation has been a source of debate and uncertainty. Initially, Finland voted against the proposal, then abstained, and now their position is “no” again. Member of Parliament Eveliina Heinaluoma questions the government’s handling of the regulation, as it seems inconsistent that Finland is now tightening its stance on it.
The Restoration Regulation aims to bring binding obligations to improve the state of nature in various habitats, which has sparked discussion in Finland and the EU. Despite Finland voting against the proposal last summer, it narrowly passed the Council of Member States. Subsequently, during tripartite negotiations, flexibilities were added to the regulation to reduce costs and give member countries more control over reconstruction efforts.
When the council voted on the regulation in November, Finland abstained, although this does not count as a vote in qualified majority decisions. Hungary’s changed vote has now further complicated the situation, as the EU president is asking member states to change their minds and vote in favor of the regulation. However, Finland remains steadfast in its decision to vote against.
Environment Minister Kai Mikkanen expressed dissatisfaction with the situation and emphasized the need for consistency in EU decision-making. Heinaluoma believes that Finland missed an opportunity to promote the green transition by not supporting